Policy, Procedure and Practice Guidance on Single-Agency and Multi-Agency Child’s Chronology (MAAC)
This guidance aims to support practitioners to understand and recognise the important key requirements in the formulation of a Single and Multi-Agency chronology for children.
1.1 This guidance aims to support practitioners to understand and recognise the important key requirements in the formulation of a Single and Multi-Agency chronology for children.
1.2 Improving outcomes for children and young people is a priority for all services. Inquiries into the deaths of Victoria Climbie (2004) and baby Peter (2008) by Lord Laming highlighted the importance of compiling chronologies in protecting children through the identification of accumulating risk.
2. Chronology Purpose
2.1 Producing a chronology is not an end in itself. The value of the chronology lies in its use as a critical tool for the collation and management of key information relating to a child or young person’s wellbeing. The chronology should not replace existing case notes or records which will include much more detailed and sensitive information on the child and family and a clear distinction must be made between the two. The chronology should be succinctly recorded and child-focussed.
2.2 Chronologies provide a key link in the chain of understanding of the child’s situation and the risks/needs that exist for them. The process of compiling, updating and reviewing a summary timeline of the service user’s circumstances supports assessment and analysis i.e. using the chronology format to systematically organise information helps identify gaps, areas for further exploration, distinguish patterns of behaviour, and demonstrate the impact of interventions. The chronology also establishes a sound foundation for future understanding and analysis where professional staff change or new staff or services engage with the family.
2.3 The chronology is also a tool that can, and should, be used to promote engagement with service users and their families. Although the content of the chronology will be determined by professional judgement, service users and their families will have views on the content and the inferences drawn. A well-constructed and skilfully employed chronology has the potential to help service users and families better understand their circumstances and thus promote their engagement in effecting change.
2.4 The chronology is thus an important tool in everyday practice and for the supervision process. Managers will be expected to monitor the use of chronologies through the use of identified Case File Audit Tools and routine supervisory arrangements.
These arrangements should consider:
2.5 Simply producing a chronology is not the objective. The chronology is not intended to be a document that is created, filed and forgotten only to be brought out and updated when asked for, or when a report is due. By keeping track of what has and what is happening for a child or young person the chronology can be integral to promoting understanding of how their unique circumstances impact on their wellbeing.
2.6 Simply amassing information does not amount to an assessment; practitioners are required to be clear as to the significance of the information collected. A well-constructed and considered chronology is therefore a valuable and dynamic working tool which aids assessment and analysis, informs decision making and intervention, and promotes engagement with service users.
2.7 It is essential that the worker ensures that all significant information shared with them is contained within their single agency chronology. Such information is vital in the assessment of children where there are emerging concerns. The named worker must ensure that chronologies are shared in a proportionate and appropriate manner with other professionals involved with the family, in line with agreed data sharing principles.
2.8 Close communication is vital between the worker and other professionals to ensure chronologies contain the most pertinent information on children, young people and their family circumstance. It’s important that the journey of the child is clear!
3. Chronology: Content
3.1 A child’s chronology is the gathering together of events, incidents, milestones and circumstances in a child’s life considered to be significant or to have possible significance by individual practitioners from a range of services and also possibly from the child and family. In all cases the child’s chronology will start with their birth, however in some cases, it will be relevant to start the chronology pre-birth. This will indicate emerging patterns of risk before the baby is born.
3.2 It is acknowledged that there are cases in which the family history is relevant to understanding the child’s circumstances and there is a need to capture this within the child’s chronology. The family history is most often communicated as part of the initial referral to Social Work and, ordinarily, this is how it should be detailed in the chronology.
3.3 A key event can be anything that has, or may have, a significantly positive or negative impact on the child. It does not have to happen to the child, but could result in a change of their circumstances, which has positive or negative consequences for them. It is important to note that what may be a key event in one child’s life may not be relevant for another child. Chronologies for all children must be individual and for siblings should not simply be replication. The choice of events to include in an individual chronology requires the use of professional judgement. The task for the practitioner is to use their professional judgement in identifying those which are having, have had, or likely to have a key impact on the wellbeing of the child/young person, ‘the so what question’.
3.4 A chronology must be:
3.5 A chronology is not:
3.6 Each service and/or agency must ensure that they have in place a mechanism to identify and collate accurately all known events considered significant in a child or young person’s life over time - the single agency chronology.
3.7 Best practice indicates that contributing to the chronology will increase the participation and encourage the involvement of children and their families.
4. Involving the Child and the Family
4.1 Chronologies are part of recording and as such should be available to the person they are about. Involving the family in the chronology provides opportunity to check and ensure accuracy of information. It also promotes and strengthens working together with children, adults and their families, as it helps to obtain family members perspectives on events and develops an understanding of their impact on individuals in the family. Sharing the chronology with the family can support them to reflect on the content and help develop their understanding of the child/adult/family as well as identify progress or lack of progress.
5. Chronology: Types of Key Events
5.1 The sorts of events or incidents to be considered for inclusion in a chronology will reflect an aspect of the child/young person’s circumstances that is significant because:
a) It would be a notable occurrence in any child or young person’s life; or
b) It is a notable occurrence in this particular child’s life
5.2 Below is a list of examples of events that would be considered for inclusion in a chronology for a child or young person known to services. Although comprehensive, the following is not an exhaustive list and does not replace professional judgement and not all of the examples will need to be used in chronologies.
5.3 Changes to family structure (to be considered by all agencies)
Start/finish of pre-school education
5.6 Social Work
5.8 Criminal Justice
NB: Agencies may want to use in their own chronology incidents as detailed above that another agency may hold
6. Multi-agency Child's Chronology (MACC): Why and When?
6.1 The MACC is simply the integration of the single agency chronologies for the child and family. Practice and research has shown that integrated chronologies can be extremely important in identifying critical events in the lives of children and can assist professionals in decision making when working together with vulnerable children and families. A single incident, no matter how significant or insignificant it may appear in itself, often takes on a far greater importance in the life of a child when placed in the context of a fully considered, time-lined integrated chronology.
6.2 A decision to collate a MACC may be an agreed outcome from a child’s wellbeing meeting or from other planning meetings such as an initial child protection case conference, Looked After Review or Public Law Outline Procedures (PLO). The following are examples of circumstances where a MACC may be of particular value in assisting the assessment and planning process.
6.3 The main purpose of compiling a MACC is to enable early intervention where patterns of concerns are beginning to emerge about a child and to inform the development of a multi-agency plan, where one is required, to meet the child’s needs and address risks.
7. Multi-agency Child Chronology: Who is responsible for developing?
7.1 When a child’s planning meeting determines the need for multi-agency child chronology a Lead Professional will be identified. This will be determined by an assessment of the child’s needs and which agency is judged as being the most appropriate to undertake the role. Where there are concerns in respect of fabricated and or induced illness the responsibility for collating the health chronology will be a Lead Paediatrician. The responsibility of collating all single agency chronologies into a MACC will be Children’s Services.
7.2 Responsibilities of the Lead Professional in relation to the MACC include:
Single/Multi-Agency Child’s Chronology
(Practitioners may want to consider colour coding this when it’s a multi-agency chronology)